| Table OA2: Multilevel Regression of Support for Income Redistribution - Model Comparisons | |||||||||||||||
| Models M5 to M7 are identical to the models presented in Table 3 in the paper | |||||||||||||||
| M5 | M6 | M7 | MOA1 | ||||||||||||
| Individual-level Variables | |||||||||||||||
| Economic threat of migration | 0.037 | ** | 0.016 | 0.038 | ** | -0.004 | |||||||||
| Cultural threat of migration | -0.026 | * | -0.004 | -0.026 | * | -0.010 | |||||||||
| Welfare abuse of migrants | -0.007 | 0.003 | -0.008 | -0.007 | |||||||||||
| Left-Right-Scale | -0.235 | *** | -0.235 | *** | -0.235 | *** | -0.235 | *** | |||||||
| Gender (man=1) | -0.095 | *** | -0.094 | *** | -0.095 | *** | -0.094 | *** | |||||||
| Age | 0.041 | *** | 0.040 | *** | 0.041 | *** | 0.040 | *** | |||||||
| Age2 | -0.021 | ** | -0.021 | ** | -0.021 | ** | -0.021 | ** | |||||||
| Household income | -0.128 | *** | -0.128 | *** | -0.128 | *** | -0.128 | *** | |||||||
| Education | |||||||||||||||
| ISCED 0-1 | 0.128 | ** | 0.127 | ** | 0.129 | ** | 0.130 | ** | |||||||
| ISCED 2 | 0.133 | ** | 0.133 | ** | 0.133 | ** | 0.133 | ** | |||||||
| ISCED 3 | 0.111 | ** | 0.111 | ** | 0.110 | ** | 0.110 | ** | |||||||
| ISCED 4 | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||||||||||
| ISCED 5-6 | -0.068 | -0.069 | -0.068 | -0.069 | |||||||||||
| Bad health status | 0.058 | *** | 0.059 | *** | 0.059 | *** | 0.059 | *** | |||||||
| Married/Civilian partnership | 0.037 | ** | 0.037 | ** | 0.037 | ** | 0.038 | ** | |||||||
| Employment Status | |||||||||||||||
| In paid work | -0.012 | -0.012 | -0.012 | -0.012 | |||||||||||
| In education | -0.110 | ** | -0.111 | ** | -0.109 | ** | -0.110 | ** | |||||||
| Unemployed | 0.080 | * | 0.080 | * | 0.081 | * | 0.080 | * | |||||||
| Not in labor force | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||||||||||
| Country-level Variables | |||||||||||||||
| Salience pro-welfare issues | 0.170 | ** | 0.171 | ** | 0.170 | ** | 0.171 | ** | |||||||
| Salience anti-migrant issues | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.023 | 0.025 | |||||||||||
| * Economic threat of migration | 0.009 | -0.031 | |||||||||||||
| * Social-democratic | 0.047 | ||||||||||||||
| * Conservative | 0.079 | * | |||||||||||||
| * Cultural threat of migration | -0.008 | -0.012 | |||||||||||||
| * Social-democratic | 0.010 | ||||||||||||||
| * Conservative | 0.025 | ||||||||||||||
| * Welfare abuse of migrants | -0.028 | *** | -0.016 | ||||||||||||
| * Social-democratic | -0.001 | ||||||||||||||
| * Conservative | -0.026 | ||||||||||||||
| Welfare Regime | |||||||||||||||
| Liberal | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | Ref. | |||||||||||
| Social-democratic | -0.325 | * | -0.325 | * | -0.324 | * | -0.327 | * | |||||||
| * Economic threat of migration | 0.031 | 0.040 | |||||||||||||
| * Cultural threat of migration | -0.044 | -0.037 | |||||||||||||
| * Welfare abuse of migrants | -0.040 | -0.019 | |||||||||||||
| Conservative | 0.141 | 0.144 | 0.140 | 0.144 | |||||||||||
| *Economic threat of migration | 0.021 | 0.050 | |||||||||||||
| * Cultural threat of migration | -0.013 | -0.004 | |||||||||||||
| * Welfare abuse of migrants | 0.009 | 0.008 | |||||||||||||
| Constant | 0.048 | 0.048 | 0.047 | 0.049 | |||||||||||
| Variance Components | |||||||||||||||
| Var(Constant) | 0.0287 | *** | 0.0233 | *** | 0.0232 | *** | 0.0283 | *** | |||||||
| Var(Economic threat of migration) | 0.0016 | *** | 0.0017 | *** | 0.0019 | *** | 0.0012 | *** | |||||||
| Var(Cultural threat of migration) | 0.0008 | *** | 0.0004 | *** | 0.0007 | *** | 0.0003 | *** | |||||||
| Var(Welfare abuse of migrants) | 0.0009 | *** | 0.0004 | *** | 0.0001 | * | 0.0000 | ||||||||
| Var(Residuals) | 0.8167 | *** | 0.8167 | *** | 0.8167 | *** | 0.8165 | *** | |||||||
| Statistics | |||||||||||||||
| N | 14 | 14 | 14 | 14 | |||||||||||
| n | 17,792 | 17,792 | 17,792 | 17,792 | |||||||||||
| Log Likelihood | -23489.057 | -23,485.18 | -23,484.37 | -23,478.17 | |||||||||||
| Wald chi2(df) | 2,130.53 | 2,144.87 | 2,154.97 | 2,180.74 | |||||||||||
| AIC | 47,032.12 | 47,036.35 | 47,028.73 | 47,040.35 | |||||||||||
| Notes: * p<.05, ** p<.01, *** p<.001 (one-sided tests). All continuous variables are z-standardized. | |||||||||||||||
| The Models M5 to M7 are the models presented in Table 3 in the paper. | |||||||||||||||
| Home | |||||||||||||||